Fan-Out Query Competitive Intelligence: See What AI Models Search Before They Answer
A deep-dive guide on using Superlines fan-out query data to understand how AI models research answers, identify competitive content gaps, and build automated competitive monitoring workflows.
Table of Contents
What are fan-out queries?
When a user asks ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google AI a question, the AI model does not always answer from memory. It frequently performs background web searches — sometimes called “fan-out queries” — to gather fresh information before generating a response. These searches are invisible to the end user, but they determine which websites get cited and which brands appear in the answer.
Superlines captures these fan-out queries and shows you exactly:
- What the AI searched for — the actual queries it sent to search engines
- Which results it found — the URLs that appeared in those searches
- Which pages earned citations — the specific URLs that made it into the final AI response
- How your competitors rank — where competitor pages appear in the AI’s research process
This data is one of the most powerful competitive intelligence signals available in AI search optimization.
Why fan-out data changes the game
Traditional SEO competitive intelligence tells you who ranks for which keywords. Fan-out query data tells you something far more actionable: which content AI models actually trust and cite when answering questions about your market.
What fan-out data reveals
| Insight | What it means | Strategic action |
|---|---|---|
| Competitor pages cited repeatedly | AI models trust this content as authoritative | Analyze what makes these pages citation-worthy, then create better content |
| Your pages appearing in searches but not cited | AI finds you but doesn’t trust you enough to cite | Audit the page for structure, authority signals, and content gaps |
| Topics you’re completely absent from | AI doesn’t even find you when researching these areas | Create new content targeting these specific topics |
| Fan-out queries that differ from the original prompt | AI rephrases and expands the user’s question | Discover adjacent topics and long-tail opportunities |
| Source diversity patterns | How many different domains AI pulls from | Understand whether your market is concentrated or fragmented |
Getting fan-out query data
In the Superlines UI
Fan-out query data is available at the prompt level in your Superlines dashboard. Navigate to any tracked prompt and look for the fan-out analysis section, which shows the background searches, source URLs, and citation patterns.
Via MCP
The get_fanout_query_insights tool provides programmatic access to fan-out data. In Claude Desktop or Cursor:
Show me the fan-out query insights for [Brand Name]. I want to see what
AI models search for when answering our tracked prompts, which competitor
pages appear most often, and where we're missing from the results.
The tool returns structured data including the fan-out queries themselves, the URLs found, citation frequency, and competitive positioning.
Workflow 1: Competitive content gap analysis
This workflow uses fan-out data to identify content you need to create or improve.
Step 1: Identify your highest-priority prompts
Start with prompts where you have low visibility but high strategic importance:
For [Brand Name], show me prompts where our brand visibility is below 30%
but at least 2 competitors are being cited. Rank by how many competitors
appear in the results.
Step 2: Analyze fan-out queries for those prompts
For each underperforming prompt, dig into what AI models actually search for:
For the prompt "[specific prompt]", show me the complete fan-out query
analysis:
1. What background searches does the AI perform?
2. Which URLs appear in those searches?
3. Which URLs earn citations in the final answer?
4. Are any of our pages found but not cited?
Step 3: Audit the winning pages
Once you know which competitor pages are earning citations, analyze why:
Audit these competitor URLs that are winning citations for
"[specific prompt]":
[paste competitor URLs from fan-out data]
For each URL, analyze:
- Content structure and depth
- Schema.org markup
- Authority signals (backlinks, domain authority)
- What specific information the page provides that we don't
- Why AI models might prefer this page over ours
If you have a SERP scraper MCP (like Bright Data) connected, the agent can crawl these pages and provide a detailed content comparison automatically.
Step 4: Create your content action plan
Based on the fan-out query analysis and competitor audit for
"[specific prompt]", create a content action plan:
1. What new pages should we create?
2. What existing pages should we update?
3. What specific information, structure, or markup changes would
make our content more citation-worthy?
4. What related topics from the fan-out queries should we cover?
Workflow 2: Steal competitive content ideas
Fan-out data reveals not just who’s winning, but exactly what content earns AI trust. This workflow systematically extracts content ideas from competitor wins.
The competitive citation audit
For [Brand Name], run a competitive citation audit:
1. Across all our tracked prompts, which competitor URLs are cited
most frequently?
2. Group these URLs by topic/theme
3. For the top 10 most-cited competitor pages, explain what makes
them citation-worthy
4. For each one, suggest a content piece we could create that would
compete for the same citations
Cross-prompt pattern analysis
The same competitor page might be cited across many different prompts. This reveals their strongest content assets:
Show me competitor domains that appear in fan-out results across 5 or
more of our tracked prompts. For each domain:
1. Which of their pages appear most often?
2. Which prompts do they dominate?
3. What content format do they use (blog posts, guides, tools, data)?
4. What's our equivalent content, if any?
Workflow 3: Discover content topics from AI search behavior
Fan-out queries often reveal topics you haven’t considered. When an AI model receives the prompt “What’s the best project management tool for startups?”, it might search for “project management tool comparison 2026”, “startup project management needs”, and “Trello vs Asana vs Monday for small teams.” Each of these searches represents a topic opportunity.
Topic discovery prompt
Analyze fan-out queries across all our tracked prompts for [Brand Name].
Find fan-out search queries that represent topics we don't currently have
content for:
1. List unique topic clusters from fan-out queries
2. Mark which topics we already cover (based on our cited URLs)
3. Highlight topics where competitors have content but we don't
4. Estimate priority based on how many prompts trigger each topic
From topics to content briefs
For the top 5 uncovered topics from the fan-out analysis, create content
briefs:
For each topic:
- Suggested title and format (article, guide, comparison, tool)
- Key questions to answer (based on the fan-out queries that surface this topic)
- Competitor content to reference and improve upon
- Target prompts this content should help us win
- Schema.org markup recommendations
Workflow 4: Automated competitive monitoring
Fan-out competitive intelligence becomes most powerful when automated. This workflow sets up continuous monitoring.
Weekly competitive snapshot
Run this prompt weekly (or set up as part of an automated pipeline):
Generate a weekly fan-out competitive intelligence report for [Brand Name]:
1. NEW THREATS: Competitor URLs that appeared in fan-out results this week
but weren't there last week
2. LOST GROUND: Prompts where we were previously cited but competitor
content has displaced us
3. OPPORTUNITIES: Fan-out queries where no strong content exists yet
(fragmented sources, low-quality results)
4. WINS: Prompts where our citations increased this week
Format as a structured report with priority actions.
Automated alert workflow
For teams building agentic workflows, you can create an autonomous monitoring system:
Check fan-out query data for [Brand Name] and compare with last week's
baseline:
1. If any new competitor URL is cited in 3+ of our tracked prompts,
flag as HIGH PRIORITY and analyze the page
2. If we lost citations on any strategic prompt (labeled "strategic"),
generate an immediate action plan
3. If new fan-out query topics emerge that we don't track, add them
as suggested prompts with the label "fanout-discovery"
Save the report to our workspace for review.
Workflow 5: Feed fan-out intelligence into content pipelines
The highest-leverage use of fan-out data is feeding it directly into content creation workflows.
The intelligence-to-content loop
Fan-Out Intelligence Content Pipeline
1. Identify prompts where 4. Create content briefs
we underperform informed by fan-out data
│ │
▼ ▼
2. Analyze fan-out queries 5. Write content that
to find what AI searches addresses the exact topics
for and who wins AI models search for
│ │
▼ ▼
3. Audit top-performing 6. Publish, then track
competitor content citation changes in
Superlines
│
▼
7. Repeat — new fan-out
data shows impact
Connecting to a content agent
If you’re using the Agentic AEO Content Pipeline, fan-out data is already integrated into Phase 1 (Intelligence Gathering) and Phase 2 (Competitive Deep Dive). The agent uses get_fanout_query_insights to discover what AI models search for, then analyze_competitor_url with Bright Data scraping to understand why certain pages win.
For simpler setups, you can manually chain the intelligence into content creation:
Using the fan-out query analysis from our top 5 underperforming prompts:
1. Identify the 3 highest-priority content pieces we should create
2. For each piece, write a detailed content brief that:
- Covers the specific topics AI models search for (from fan-out data)
- Matches or exceeds the depth of the top-cited competitor content
- Includes recommended Schema.org markup
- Targets specific prompts and fan-out queries
3. If possible, draft the first article in full
Advanced: Combining fan-out data with prompt discovery
Fan-out queries are also a discovery mechanism for new prompts to track. The background searches AI performs often reveal adjacent questions and topics that your audience cares about.
Fan-out to prompt pipeline
Analyze all fan-out queries from our tracked prompts for [Brand Name]:
1. Extract unique fan-out search queries that look like questions a
user might directly ask an AI assistant
2. Check which of these we're already tracking as prompts
3. For any that we're NOT tracking, estimate their strategic importance
based on:
- How many of our tracked prompts trigger this fan-out query
- Whether competitors are well-positioned for these topics
- Whether we have existing content that could compete
4. Add the top 10 most important ones to Superlines tracking with the
label "fanout-discovered"
This creates a self-reinforcing loop: your tracked prompts generate fan-out data, which reveals new prompts to track, which generates more fan-out data. Over time, your prompt portfolio grows organically to cover the full landscape of how AI models research your market.
Key takeaways
- Fan-out queries are the X-ray of AI search — they show the research process AI models use before generating answers
- Competitive intelligence from fan-out data is more actionable than traditional SEO data — it shows which content AI models actually trust and cite
- Content gaps are immediately visible — if your pages appear in fan-out searches but aren’t cited, you know exactly what to fix
- Automation multiplies the value — weekly monitoring and automated alerts turn fan-out intelligence into a continuous competitive advantage
- The data feeds content strategy directly — fan-out topics tell you exactly what to write about to earn more citations
Start with Workflow 1 to identify your most urgent competitive gaps, then build toward automated monitoring as you develop your agentic workflow capabilities.